Theory of Neverything
edited
... The contradiction arises as a result of a philosophical category error. It is not possible to …
...
The contradiction arises as a result of a philosophical category error. It is not possible to discuss learning and school in the same context in any sensible manner at all.
What makes school so resistant to change does not need other explanations. Before proceeding to theAn article itself, maybe you would first want to have a look at its main points:
http://slidesha.re/1Aihz1V
But in case, you would like to proceed toabout the complete depths of the article right away itsubject is available
:
Theory of Neverything
edited
... Educational discussion is characterized by a divide. There are those who want to develop schoo…
...
Educational discussion is characterized by a divide. There are those who want to develop school and those who want to develop learning. These two interest groups contradict each other to the largest extent.
The contradiction arises as a result of a philosophical category error. It is not possible to discuss learning and school in the same context in any sensible manner at all.
...
not need any other explanations.
Before proceeding to the article itself, maybe you would first want to have a look at its main points:
http://slidesha.re/1Aihz1V
Theory of Neverything
edited
... Finland
Foreword
... is school.
Learning is a state of mind. School, in turn, is a soc…
...
Finland
Foreword
...
is school.
Learning is a state of mind. School, in turn, is a societal and political entity.
School is intended to provide circumstances which are appropriate to determine marks, scores, grades and degrees rather than to learn. School very much relies on its ability to regulate the flow of the students to their higher education, adulthood professions, social relationships and economical status.
Theory of Neverything
edited
... Finland
Foreword
... have been made used to believe ... is school. For a mature teach…
...
Finland
Foreword
...
have been madeused to believe
...
is school. For a mature teacher profession to develop it is central for the teacher to understand how learning and school differ from each other.
Learning
Learning is a
...
political entity.
School is intended to provide circumstances which are appropriate to determine marks, scores, grades and degrees rather than to learn. School very much relies on its ability to regulate the flow of the students to their higher education, adulthood professions, social relationships and economical status.
By fulfilling these tasks school is responsible of creating and supporting social inequality. On the other hand, the modern societies are completely dependent and in many ways thoroughly built on the “segregational services” provided by the school.
Educational discussion is characterized by a divide. There are those who want to develop school and those who want to develop learning. These two interest groups contradict each other to the largest extent.
...
at all. School is a collection of structural phenomena which distract the interaction of the teacher and the learners.
What makes school so resistant to change does not need any other explanations.
Before proceeding to the article itself, maybe you would first want to have a look at its main points:
http://slidesha.re/1Aihz1V
Theory of Neverything
edited
... By fulfilling these tasks school is responsible of creating and supporting social inequality. …
...
By fulfilling these tasks school is responsible of creating and supporting social inequality. On the other hand, the modern societies are completely dependent and in many ways thoroughly built on the “segregational services” provided by the school.
Educational discussion is characterized by a divide. There are those who want to develop school and those who want to develop learning. These two interest groups contradict each other to the largest extent.
...
phenomena which disturbdistract the interaction
Before proceeding to the article itself, maybe you would first want to have a look at its main points:
http://slidesha.re/1Aihz1V
Theory of Neverything
edited
... Finland
Foreword
For We have been made to believe that what is happening at school is lear…
...
Finland
Foreword ForWe have been made to believe that what is happening at school is learning. But what is happening at school is school. For a mature
...
each other. We have been made to believe that what is happening at school is learning. But what is happening at school is school.
Learning
Learning is a
...
political entity.
School is intended to provide circumstances which are appropriate to determine marks, scores, grades and degrees rather than to learn. School very much relies on its ability to regulate the flow of the students to their higher education, adulthood professions, social relationships and economical status.
...
on the segregational services“segregational services” provided by the school.
After a closer look it becomes evident that it is not possible to discuss learning and school in the same context in any sensible manner at all. By doing this we only become guilty of a philosophical category error. In addition to many other things the error explains why the results of our recent technological development (ICT) have found it so difficult to reach the schools.
Educational discussion
...
These two objectivesinterest groups contradict each
...
largest extent.
It is
The contradiction arises as a result of no value only to criticize the conventions of the school.a philosophical category error. It is of key importancenot possible to understand whydiscuss learning and school in the unwanted characteristics developsame context in the first place. And itany sensible manner at all. School is school that disturbsa collection of structural phenomena which disturb the interaction
...
and the learner.learners.
Before proceeding to the article itself, maybe you would first want to have a look at its main points:
http://slidesha.re/1Aihz1V
Theory of Neverything
edited
... After a closer look it becomes evident that it is not possible to discuss learning and school …
...
After a closer look it becomes evident that it is not possible to discuss learning and school in the same context in any sensible manner at all. By doing this we only become guilty of a philosophical category error. In addition to many other things the error explains why the results of our recent technological development (ICT) have found it so difficult to reach the schools.
Educational discussion is characterized by a divide. There are those who want to develop school and those who want to develop learning. These two objectives contradict each other to the largest extent.
It is school that disturbs the interaction of the teacher and the learner. It is of
...
first place. And it is school that disturbs the interaction of the teacher and the learner.
Before proceeding to the article itself, maybe you would first want to have a look at its main points:
http://slidesha.re/1Aihz1V